Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Categories
Uncategorized

“How many lifetimes?” The experience of the Digging into Data Challenge projects

“How many lifetimes?” was the recurrent question that the authors of the One Culture report kept on coming up against in their investigations of the work of the first round of projects that took part in the Digging into Data Challenge.

The projects were all founded on a high degree of international collaborations and set off to analyse and extrapolate patters of meaning from huge data sets, including tens of thousands of audio files, trail transcripts, spoken word, and hundreds of thousands of primary and secondary text sources.

The programme was funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) with the support of partners such as JISC in the UK, the Social Science and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) in Canada, and the National Science Foundation (NSF) in the US.

The report offers a number of “urgent, pointed, and even disruptive” recommendations that highlight how the digital research landscape is changing and how institutions and research activity should adapt to support these new emerging practices.

The top 5 recommendations are:

1 Expand our concept of research and what expertise is required for computationally intense research projects (eg domain (or subject), expertise, analytical expertise, data expertise, and project management expertise.)

2 Expand our concept of research data and accept the challenges that digital research data present, both in terms of how much data is used in research and how much is produced, and the need to look after it.

3. Embrace interdisciplinarity and work across academic communities and
traditionally bounded fields.

4. Take a more inclusive approach to collaboration and work outside own academic departments and institutions by involving library, information technology (IT), and other academic staff; graduate and postdoctoral fellows; undergraduates; and even citizen scholars.

5. Address major gaps in training for faculty, staff, and students through training programmes that correlate sound methodological strategies with appropriate new technologies.

JISC is also involved in phase 2 of the Digging into Data Challenge which has funded 14 projects, currently running.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *