Problems of Marriage and Sex, 1937

“As the Headmaster came into lunch, he slipped into my side-pocket a copy of the ‘New Era’ dealing with problems of Marriage and Sex. Why? A nice gesture of friendliness, anyway.”

The above is a transcribed excerpt from a teacher’s diary from Keswick, Cumbria in 1937, the typescript of which is below. It is part of the material released from the Mass Observation Archive as part of the MOCO project – Mass Observation Communities Online.

The MOCO project has had two aims, and more diaries and photographs are available via the links below

1) Releasing sample content from the Mass Observation Archive, largely in the period 1937 to 1941.
2) Inviting and publishing content from contemporary community groups, who are contributing the content via the web tools developed by the project team.

Comments

Strandlines Digital Communities

The Stand is one of the oldest streets in London.  It follows the line of the Roman road of Akeman, and lies on the Saxon boundary of Aldwych.

The Strand is located in the centre of London.  It is the eye in a storm of diverse people, communities, societies and organisations that inhabit this busy thoroughfare.

A new project from Kings College, London will work closely with a range of local communities to help represent life on the Strand in ways meaningful to those communities, and to the academic community of Kings.

Strandlines will imaginatively explore the significance of place in people’s lives: Using academic expertise to suggest frameworks, especially life-writing, social media and oral history, to enable connection and engagement between the different Strand communities.

The project will create an online, interactive resource documenting life and work on the Strand over the past 200 years, through stories, audio and photographs. It will combine material taken from the College’s own archive, Westminster City Archives and elsewhere with people’s own photographs and memories, captured through a grassroots digitisation project.

To find out more about this project you can visit the Strandlines website.  The Strandlines Digital Community is part of a larger project aiming to “explore lives on the Strand – past, present and creative”.

Comments

Making a case for public engagement


I have recently attended a number of events on the role(s) of Public engagement in the Arts and Humanities.

As a result I thought it might be useful to document some of the key issues that arose from these events, and some of the actions institutions and departments have been taking to deal with these challenges.

These are not exhaustive, nor final… just some of the more interesting points that arose from the discussions.

Benefits of Public Engagement

  • New research outputs and collaborations – How does engaging the public change the nature of research outputs?  Indeed, members of the public can do aspects of research that individual researchers are unable to do by themselves (e.g. Galaxy Zoo)
  • Opening up new research areas – by involving the public can entirely new areas of research be uncovered?
  • Dissemination - Engaged research is already embedded within communities and interested groups etc.  Dissemination is a natural part and benefit of public engagement, not an add-on or after thought.
  • Making research relevant – If we are sceptical of that which we do not understand, then our involvement in that work means it becomes important to us all, and we are able to better understand its benefits.  At times of scrutiny (especially financial) that understanding can be extremely important.

Issues with Public Engagement

  • ‘Self-defined’ engagement – Is this publicly instigated or research led engagement?  What are the implications for engagement if it is always led and instigated by the researcher?
  • Low institutional statusAngela Hobbs gave a fasinating presentation on her unique role as Senior Fellow for the Public Understanding of Philosophy.  However, it was made very clear to Angela that this role would significantly hamper her chances of promotion and that in times of crisis hers could be the first to be cut!  Why would early career researchers adopt engagement if it is bestowed with such low staus by many institutions (in practice, if not in spirit).
  • Tension between research outputs and engagement – The low status of engagement often stems from this issue: It is hard to keep research outputs high and still effectively engage with the public.  Usually it is the researchers career that suffers!
  • Lack of recognition – Again, this follows from the lack of status within institutions, but engagement is not, generally, formally recognised within the academy.  This is probably the biggest barrier to embedding public engagement within researchers work.
  • Lack of best practice – Despite the fact that public engagement is not a new way of working (researchers have been working in this way for a long time) there is very little in the way of best practice and support for this type of research methodology.  A few organisations, such as the National Co-Ordinating Centre for Public Engagement, are however, working to change this.

Toughts for Funders

Is the way we fund engagement part of the issue? The project methodology is a possible barrier to the uptake and embedding of public engagement by researchers – when the funding ends, so does the engagement.  Are there better ways of funding projects and research to engage outside of the academy?

Another issue that arises from the funding model is that researchers often lack the partnerships and collaborators prior to funding being available.  Could funders provide small amounts of money to establish some of these engagements and relationships, before large amounts of money are spent on research.

A final thought is about Impact and public engagement projects/research: How do we measure the impact that community and public engagement projects have within both the academy and the community?  indeed can we really measure it?

Should it be less about impact and evaluation and more about dissemination and best practice?:

You can count the number of seeds you sow; not the quality of the trees that will grow

Finally…

The recently funded Community Content projects from JISC confront and address many of the issues that arose from the discussions and workshops at these events.  Visit the project webpages to discover more.

Comments

New Community Collection Project looking for submissions

‘How easily can treasure
buried in the ground, gold hidden
however skilfully, escape from any man!

Seamus Heaney (transl.) Beowulf

A new exemplar community collection is now live: Project Woruldhord.

The project  is trialling the processes and the community contributed collection (‘CoCoCo’) software being formed by the RunCoCo project.

The project is trying to collect any material that would be of help to people who wish to find out more about the Anglo-Saxon period of history and the language and literature.

The project is looking for images, audio/video recordings, handouts, essays, articles, presentations, spreadsheets, databases, and so on.

In particular it is hoped teachers/researchers will contribute teaching material they are happy to share with others.

The most important page to get started is:
http://poppy.nsms.ox.ac.uk/woruldhord

This takes you through the simple to use submission process where you can upload your object and provide some basic information about it.

If you have any questions please email the project:  woruldhord@oucs.ox.ac.uk

Comments